Justice Department sues UCLA over alleged failure to address antisemitism during campus protests
Campus protests often test a university’s ability to balance speech, safety and policy. At the University of California, Los Angeles, that balance is now the subject of a federal lawsuit.The United States Department of Justice has sued the University of California, alleging that UCLA failed to protect Jewish and Israeli employees from antisemitic harassment during pro Palestine protests in 2023 and 2024. The Associated Press reports that the lawsuit was filed Tuesday in California and marks an escalation in the Trump administration’s scrutiny of universities it accuses of being soft on antisemitism.Although the complaint is filed against the University of California system, which includes 10 campuses, it focuses on events at UCLA.
What the lawsuit alleges
According to AP, federal officials previously concluded that UCLA failed to protect Jewish students. Last year, UCLA agreed to a 6 million dollar settlement with three Jewish students and one Jewish professor who had sued the university.The new lawsuit argues that the harm extended beyond those cases. It states that the impact on Jewish and Israeli employees “goes much deeper” than what was addressed in the earlier settlement. The complaint says the federal government will now act to “protect Jewish and Israeli employees” from antisemitic harassment, according to AP.Much of the federal complaint centres on a 2024 protest encampment. Federal officials allege that the encampment blocked Jewish employees and students from accessing parts of campus and included antisemitic signs and chants.One night, counterprotesters attacked the encampment, throwing traffic cones and deploying pepper spray. Fighting continued for hours and injured more than a dozen people before police intervened. The following day, more than 200 people were arrested after defying orders to disperse, according to AP.The 81 page lawsuit alleges that UCLA violated its own policies by allowing the encampment to continue and by failing to discipline students, faculty or staff for antisemitic conduct. The Justice Department claims that the university “turned a blind eye” to antisemitic acts and ignored complaints from Jewish and Israeli employees.The suit asks a judge to require UCLA to enforce its anti discrimination policies and to award damages to Jewish employees who allegedly faced a hostile work environment. It does not specify an amount.
UCLA’s response
In a statement, UCLA said it has taken “concrete and significant steps” to strengthen campus security, enforce policies and address antisemitism, AP reports.“Antisemitism is abhorrent and has no place at UCLA or elsewhere,” Mary Osako, vice chancellor for strategic communications, said in the statement, according to AP.UCLA has also pointed to institutional changes. The university created an Office of Campus and Community Safety and adopted new protest management policies. Chancellor Julio Frenk launched an initiative to address antisemitism and anti Israeli bias. Osako said the university would defend its actions and its commitment to a safe and inclusive environment.
A broader federal campaign
The lawsuit fits into a wider effort by the Trump administration to pressure universities over allegations of antisemitism. AP reports that the administration has largely focused on private institutions but that UCLA is one of the few public universities targeted.Last summer, the administration sought 1 billion dollars from UCLA as part of a potential settlement to resolve federal scrutiny. Federal officials also cut hundreds of millions of dollars in funding to the university. A federal judge later ordered that funding restored in September and barred the government from imposing fines in November.
What this means for campuses
For universities, the case raises questions about institutional responsibility during large scale protests. Administrators must weigh free expression against anti discrimination obligations. When protests escalate, the legal and financial stakes can extend beyond campus boundaries.For faculty and staff, the lawsuit centres on workplace protections. Federal civil rights law requires employers, including public universities, to prevent hostile work environments based on protected characteristics. The Justice Department argues that UCLA did not meet that standard.For students, the implications are indirect but significant. Policies governing protests, discipline and campus access may tighten. Funding disputes between universities and the federal government can also affect research, staffing and student services.The case will now move through federal court. Its outcome may influence how universities define the limits of protest and the scope of their duty to protect employees and students during periods of political unrest.
